In 2026 the arithmetic of staying overnight in Japan quietly changed. On 1 April, Hokkaido and 13 of its municipalities began taxing lodging on the same day; in March Kyoto City raised its top rate to ¥10,000 per person per night; and on 30 June Tokyo received central government consent to switch to a flat 3% of the room rate. This is the accommodation tax (shukuhaku-zei). It is not a tourist-only levy: it applies just the same when you travel for work, when you stay near a hospital where a parent is admitted, or when you come home for a funeral. Below is where it applies and how much, how prefectures and cities stack their taxes on the same night, and the consumption-tax trap that catches bookkeepers.
What the accommodation tax is: a tax municipalities invented themselves
Unlike resident tax or fixed asset tax, the accommodation tax is not listed in the Local Tax Act. Local governments may create their own tax items by ordinance — these are called non-statutory taxes. Where the revenue is earmarked, it is a non-statutory earmarked tax, and every municipality that levies an accommodation tax does so in this form.
A municipality cannot simply impose it. After the local assembly passes the ordinance, the municipality must consult the Minister and obtain consent (Local Tax Act arts. 259, 669, 731). The Minister hears the Local Public Finance Council and notifies the Minister of Finance. Consent may be withheld only in three cases:
- The tax shares a tax base with a national or other local tax and the burden on residents would be markedly excessive
- It would seriously obstruct the movement of goods between local governments
- Otherwise inappropriate in light of national economic policy
Tokyo was first, on 1 October 2002. Nothing followed for 14 years until Osaka Prefecture in 2017. What changed the picture was inbound travel: 36.87 million foreign visitors came to Japan in 2024, well above the pre-pandemic peak of 31.88 million in 2019. Municipalities with heavy visitor traffic turned to the tax to fund reception infrastructure and overtourism measures.
According to a House of Councillors research paper, as of 9 October 2025, 42 local governments had obtained ministerial consent and only 14 had actually started collecting. In other words, roughly 28 were queued up to start around 2026. Nikkei reported that about 30 municipalities would begin in 2026, taking the total from 17 at the end of 2025 to around 50.
The taxpayer is the guest. You do not file anything: hotels, ryokan, simple lodgings and private lodging (minpaku) operators collect it as special collection agents and remit it to the local government. That is why it appears as a separate ¥200 line at checkout — the property keeps none of it. If you run a minpaku, note that you are on the collecting side.
Where it applies and how much (as of August 2026)
All amounts are per person, per night. The room rate used for the brackets is generally the room-only price, excluding meals and consumption tax.
Flatsingle amount Tieredvaries by room rate Ratepercentage of the room rate
Hokkaido (prefecture and municipalities both levy)
| Local government | Type | Amount (per person per night) | Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hokkaido (prefectural) | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥100 / ¥20k–under ¥50k ¥200 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Sapporo | Tiered | Under ¥50k ¥200 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Hakodate | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥100 / ¥20k– ¥200 / ¥50k– ¥500 / ¥100k+ ¥2,000 | 2026.4.1 |
| Otaru, Asahikawa, Kushiro, Obihiro, Kitami, Abashiri, Otofuke | Flat | ¥200 | 2026.4.1 |
| Furano | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥200 / ¥20k– ¥300 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Rusutsu, Shimukappu | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥100 / ¥20k– ¥200 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Shintoku | Tiered | Under ¥5k ¥50 / ¥5k– ¥100 / ¥20k– ¥200 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Niseko | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥200 / ¥20k– ¥500 / ¥50k– ¥1,000 / ¥100k+ ¥2,000 (for the time being, under ¥5,001 is ¥100) | 2024.11.1 |
| Kutchan | Rate | 3% of the room rate (2% until March 2026; includes the prefectural portion) | 2019.11.1 |
| Akaigawa | Tiered | ¥8k–under ¥20k ¥200 / ¥20k+ ¥500 | 2025.11.1 |
Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku
| Local government | Type | Amount | Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hirosaki (Aomori) | Flat | ¥200 | 2025.12.1 |
| Miyagi Prefecture | Flat | ¥6k+ ¥300 (¥100 within Sendai) | 2026.1.13 |
| Sendai | Flat | ¥6k+ ¥200 | 2026.1.13 |
| Tokyo | Tiered | ¥10k–under ¥15k ¥100 / ¥15k+ ¥200 (under ¥10k exempt) | 2002.10.1 |
| Yugawara (Kanagawa) | Tiered | Under ¥50k ¥300 / ¥50k+ ¥500 | 2026.4.1 |
| Kanazawa (Ishikawa) | Tiered | ¥5k–under ¥20k ¥200 / ¥20k+ ¥500 | 2019.4.1 |
Chubu and Kansai
| Local government | Type | Amount | Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karuizawa (Nagano) | Tiered | ¥6k– ¥150 / ¥10k– ¥200 / ¥100k+ ¥650 (¥100 / ¥150 / ¥600 for the first three years) | 2026.6.1 |
| Achi (Nagano) | Flat | ¥6k+ ¥200 | 2026.6.1 |
| Hakuba (Nagano) | Tiered | ¥6k– ¥150 / ¥20k– ¥350 / ¥50k– ¥850 / ¥100k+ ¥1,850 (¥100 / ¥300 / ¥800 / ¥1,800 for the first three years) | 2026.6.1 |
| Gifu City | Flat | ¥200 | 2026.4.1 |
| Takayama (Gifu) | Tiered | Under ¥10k ¥100 / ¥10k– ¥200 / ¥30k+ ¥300 | 2025.10.1 |
| Gero (Gifu) | Tiered | Under ¥5k ¥100 / ¥5k+ ¥200 | 2025.10.1 |
| Atami (Shizuoka) | Flat | ¥200 | 2025.4.1 |
| Tokoname (Aichi) | Flat | ¥200 | 2025.1.6 |
| Toba (Mie) | Flat | ¥200 | 2026.4.1 |
| Kyoto City | Tiered | Under ¥6k ¥200 / ¥6k– ¥400 / ¥20k– ¥1,000 / ¥50k– ¥4,000 / ¥100k+ ¥10,000 | 2018.10.1 (revised 2026.3.1) |
| Osaka Prefecture | Tiered | ¥5k– ¥200 / ¥15k– ¥400 / ¥20k+ ¥500 | 2017.1.1 |
Chugoku, Kyushu and Okinawa
| Local government | Type | Amount | Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matsue (Shimane) | Flat | ¥5k+ ¥200 | 2025.12.1 |
| Hiroshima Prefecture | Flat | ¥6k+ ¥200 | 2026.4.1 |
| Fukuoka Prefecture | Flat | ¥200 (¥50 within Fukuoka City and Kitakyushu; ¥100 in municipalities newly levying their own) | 2020.4.1 |
| Fukuoka City | Tiered | Under ¥20k ¥150 / ¥20k+ ¥450 | 2020.4.1 |
| Kitakyushu | Flat | ¥150 | 2020.4.1 |
| Nagasaki City | Tiered | Under ¥10k ¥100 / ¥10k– ¥200 / ¥20k+ ¥500 | 2023.4.1 |
| Kumamoto City | Flat | ¥200 | 2026.7.1 |
| Miyazaki City | Flat | ¥200 | 2026.7.1 |
Coming next
| Local government | Content | From |
|---|---|---|
| NewNasu (Tochigi) | Under ¥10k ¥100 / ¥10k– ¥300 / ¥20k– ¥500 / ¥30k– ¥800 / ¥50k– ¥1,500 / ¥100k+ ¥3,000 | 2026.10.1 |
| NewMorioka (Iwate) | New accommodation tax | 2026.10.1 |
| NewOkinawa Prefecture and five municipalities (Ishigaki, Miyakojima, Motobu, Chatan, Onna) | Prefectural portion 0.8% (capped at ¥800). Where both levy, the combined rate stays at 2%, capped at ¥2,000 | 2027.2.1 |
| RevisedTokyo | Flat amounts replaced by 3% of the room rate. Minpaku and simple lodgings added. Exemption threshold raised from under ¥10,000 to under ¥13,000 | 2027.4.1 |
| RevisedNagasaki City | Rate revision | 2027.4.1 |
The list reflects what had been published or reported as of August 2026. More municipalities have ministerial consent without a fixed start date, and others are still in consultation.
What Tokyo's 3% flat rate means
On 30 June 2026 the Minister consented to Tokyo's revision. From stays on and after 1 April 2027, the current tiered amounts (¥100 for ¥10,000–under ¥15,000, ¥200 for ¥15,000 and above) are replaced by 3% of the room rate. Tokyo expects revenue to rise from about ¥8.1 billion in FY2026 to roughly ¥19 billion a year.
By design, the more expensive the room, the steeper the increase. At the other end, the exemption threshold rises from under ¥10,000 to under ¥13,000, so some business-hotel stays fall out of the tax. Given how Tokyo room rates have moved in recent years, however, many properties that were once under ¥10,000 now clear ¥13,000.
Tokyo's current tax covers only hotels and ryokan. After the revision, simple lodgings and private lodging (minpaku) are also covered. Operators in Tokyo will have to collect and remit the tax from April 2027. Filing moves from monthly to once every three months, and the ¥1 million annual cap on the collection agent's grant is abolished. See minpaku and taxes for the wider picture.
When the prefecture and the city both tax the same night
Both prefectures and municipalities may levy. As of August 2026 that overlap exists in Hokkaido, Miyagi and Fukuoka, and Okinawa joins in February 2027. How they coordinate differs.
| Area | Coordination | Guest pays |
|---|---|---|
| Hokkaido | No rate adjustment between the prefecture and municipalities, except Kutchan | Simple sum of both |
| Kutchan (Hokkaido) | The town raised its rate from 2% to 3% and treats 3% minus the prefectural equivalent as its own tax, collecting and remitting the prefectural share | 3% of the room rate in total |
| Miyagi | Prefectural tax cut from ¥300 to ¥100 inside Sendai | ¥300 total in Sendai |
| Fukuoka | Prefectural tax cut from ¥200 to ¥50 inside Fukuoka City and Kitakyushu | Broadly ¥200 across the prefecture |
| Okinawa | Prefecture 0.8% (capped ¥800), designed so the combined burden stays at 2% capped at ¥2,000 | 2% of the room rate in total |
- Sapporo, ¥20,000 a night: Hokkaido ¥200 + Sapporo ¥200 = ¥400
- Hakodate, ¥120,000 room: Hokkaido ¥500 + Hakodate ¥2,000 = ¥2,500
- Niseko, ¥60,000 a night: Hokkaido ¥500 + Niseko ¥1,000 = ¥1,500
- Kutchan, ¥30,000 a night: 3% combined = ¥900
- Fukuoka City, ¥20,000 a night: Fukuoka Pref. ¥50 + Fukuoka City ¥450 = ¥500
- Kyoto City, ¥100,000 room: ¥10,000 — 10% of the room rate
Multiply by heads and nights: a family of four for two nights in Sapporo pays ¥400 × 4 × 2 = ¥3,200.
At the Local Public Finance Council on 5 August 2025, members said the materials Kyoto had submitted were "insufficient to conclude that charging ¥10,000 on rooms of ¥100,000 or more is not a markedly excessive burden," and asked the city to explain why its fiscal needs justified a relatively high rate. Consent followed on 3 October 2025. There is no codified ceiling, and the ministry's position is that each case must be judged on its own facts.
Business trips, hospital visits and funerals are all taxed
The taxable event is the act of staying at a lodging facility, not the purpose of the stay. So the tax applies to work travel, exams and job interviews, staying near a hospitalised family member, returning home for a funeral, and stays during an evacuation unless the municipality has its own relief.
Taxed regardless of purpose
Business trips; client visits; sitting an exam; accompanying a family member in hospital; funerals and memorial services; stopovers on the way to a posting.
Exempt in most municipalities
School trips and other school events, covering both students and accompanying staff, are exempted by ordinance on public-interest grounds. The precise scope differs by municipality.
Consideration for non-tourist stays has historically been delivered through the exemption threshold rather than through exemptions. Tokyo set its original ¥10,000 floor precisely to spare school trips and business travel. With room rates where they now are, that design no longer works as intended — which is part of why Tokyo is lifting the floor to ¥13,000.
Local Tax Act arts. 274, 684 and 733-13 permit relief from non-statutory taxes only for those who have lost the ability to pay through disaster or poverty, or who have "other special circumstances" — read narrowly as cases with strong public interest. In Minoh City, Osaka, the ministry found that a reduction limited to businesses headquartered in the city risked breaching the Act and was inappropriate in light of tax fairness; the city removed the provision. Requests such as "exempt local residents" rarely survive for this reason.
At hot-spring inns, the bathing tax stacks on top
Hot-spring properties also charge the bathing tax (nyuto-zei), a statutory earmarked tax under Local Tax Act art. 701 levied by municipalities with mineral spring baths. The standard rate is ¥150 per person per day (a one-night stay counts as one day), also collected by the property.
Because the taxable events differ — bathing at a mineral spring versus staying overnight — this is not treated as double taxation. From the guest's side it is still two local taxes on one night, and Fukuoka City therefore cut the bathing tax for overnight bathers from ¥150 to ¥50 while its accommodation tax is in force. Toba City in Mie has published a division of labour: accommodation tax for visitor reception infrastructure, bathing tax for spring-source protection, firefighting capacity and existing tourism programmes.
- Accommodation tax: ¥200 × 2 = ¥400
- Bathing tax: ¥150 × 2 = ¥300 (rate set by municipal ordinance)
- ¥700 in total on top of the room rate
The bookkeeping trap: no consumption tax on the accommodation tax
The room rate is subject to consumption tax, but the accommodation tax is not consideration for a supply of goods or services, so it falls outside the scope of consumption tax. It is money the property holds on behalf of the local government. Consequently the accommodation tax portion does not qualify for input tax credit.
| How the receipt reads | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Accommodation tax shown as a separate line with an amount | Book that portion as taxes and dues (out of scope) and the rest as travel expenses (taxable purchase) |
| No accommodation tax line, total only | Booking the whole payment as travel expenses (taxable purchase) is accepted |
Booking the total as a taxable purchase without checking the breakdown means claiming more input credit than you are entitled to. ¥200 a night sounds trivial until a travel-heavy company books hundreds of nights a year. The effect is largest for businesses filing under the standard method. Under the invoice system, qualified invoices break out amounts by rate, so it is worth checking once how your usual hotels present the line. For sole proprietors, an accommodation tax paid on a business trip is a deductible expense; see also ten grey-area expenses for sole proprietors.
Will it become a nationwide statutory tax?
The Japan Association of Corporate Executives proposed in March 2024 that the accommodation tax be added to the Local Tax Act as a statutory earmarked tax and rolled out nationwide. The Japan Local Government Centre has argued that a patchwork risks pushing guests into neighbouring areas, so a uniform national scheme may be needed.
The ministry's position is that it would need broad public understanding as well as the agreement of municipalities that already levy their own, and that "given that taxation is tailored to each locality's needs, there is no strong necessity at present to unify the system, and we are not considering making it a statutory tax immediately."
History matters here too. Until the end of March 2000 prefectures levied a special local consumption tax on lodging and dining at 3%, exempt below ¥15,000 per person per night. It was abolished in the FY1997 reform because the new 1% local consumption tax would have duplicated it. Japan has already once consolidated lodging levies into the local consumption tax.
Earmarked taxes also invite scrutiny of spending, yet the ministry notes that the Local Tax Act does not require disclosure of how non-statutory tax revenue is used, so it does not track disclosure comprehensively. Practices vary from itemised annual figures to narrative descriptions of funded projects. The most practical check a guest can make is to look up what the city they stayed in actually spent it on.
FAQ
Q. Who actually pays the accommodation tax?
A. The guest is the taxpayer. Hotels, ryokan, simple lodgings and minpaku operators collect it as special collection agents and remit it to the local government. The property keeps none of it and bears the administrative burden of collection and filing, which is why it appears as a separate line at checkout.
Q. Does it apply to business trips and hospital visits?
A. Yes. The taxable event is staying at a lodging facility, regardless of purpose. Business travel, exams, accompanying a hospitalised family member and funerals are all taxed. What most municipalities exempt is school trips and school events, and the exact scope is set by each ordinance.
Q. Isn't paying both a prefectural and a municipal tax double taxation?
A. Both levels may levy, so it is not double taxation as a matter of law. Several areas coordinate to limit the burden: Fukuoka Prefecture charges ¥50 instead of ¥200 inside Fukuoka City and Kitakyushu, and Miyagi charges ¥100 instead of ¥300 inside Sendai. Hokkaido does not adjust except in Kutchan, so the amounts simply add up. Okinawa is designed so the combined burden stays at 2%, capped at ¥2,000.
Q. Is consumption tax charged on the accommodation tax, and how do I book it?
A. The accommodation tax is not consideration for a supply, so it is outside the scope of consumption tax and does not qualify for input tax credit. If the receipt shows it separately, book that portion as taxes and dues (out of scope) and the rest as travel expenses. If only a total is shown, booking the whole amount as a taxable purchase is accepted.
Q. How is the bathing tax different?
A. The bathing tax is a statutory earmarked tax under Local Tax Act art. 701, levied by municipalities with mineral spring baths on the act of bathing, at a standard ¥150 per person per day. The accommodation tax is a non-statutory earmarked tax on the act of staying overnight. Both can apply at a hot-spring inn. Fukuoka City cut the bathing tax for overnight bathers from ¥150 to ¥50 while its accommodation tax is in force.
Q. What will Tokyo's tax cost from 2027?
A. From stays on and after 1 April 2027 it becomes 3% of the room rate. The exemption threshold rises from under ¥10,000 to under ¥13,000, and minpaku and simple lodgings come into scope. A ¥20,000 night costs ¥600 (currently ¥200) and a ¥50,000 night ¥1,500 (currently ¥200). Tokyo expects revenue to rise from about ¥8.1 billion in FY2026 to roughly ¥19 billion a year.
Sources
This article is general information. Accommodation tax rates, exemption thresholds and reliefs are set by local ordinance and change. For individual bookkeeping or filing decisions, consult a tax office or a licensed tax accountant.